Skip to main content
More Insights

Why We Are Still Working on the Energy Transition

August 27, 2025

When I’m asked whether Cornell Atkinson will continue to prioritize the energy transition despite recent changes to U.S. federal energy policy, my answer is a resounding yes. The future of non-carbon-based energy is not as bleak as some climate advocacy groups assert. Here are three reasons for optimism.

First, the Trump administration is trying to kill only some non-carbon-based energy sources. It has halted development of new offshore wind farms, and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 hastens the demise of tax breaks and other incentives for solar and wind production and electric vehicle purchases. These steps and the administration’s deemphasis of the costs and emphasis on the benefits of climate change, e.g., in the recent “Critical Review” report from the Department of Energy, might suggest that the energy transition will come to an end. However, OBBBA also incentivizes other non-carbon energy sources, including green hydrogen and next-generation geothermal, hydropower, and nuclear – as well as energy storage – well into the 2030s.

Second, the biggest potential gains in climate mitigation and adaptation are now in the Global South—not in the U.S. Given current trajectories of population growth and energy demand, the U.S. will be responsible for only 10% of global emissions in the 21st century. In contrast, the share of global human population that is African will rise from about 18% today to about 40% by 2100, and energy use per capita in Africa will skyrocket. The most efficient path to global decarbonization is to export to the Global South the innovations, technologies, and products (in addition to natural gas) that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Replacing a coal burning plant in South Africa, where coal currently provides 70% of electricity, with solar farms, wind farms, or nuclear plants would produce a much bigger global bang for the buck than investing in a further incremental reduction in U.S. emissions.

Finally, affordably satisfying the dramatic increase in U.S. electricity demand – turbocharged by data center construction to support the booming AI industry – will require an all-of-the-above strategy of energy production. Since utility-scale solar and onshore wind are the most quickly deployable energy generation sources, as well as the cheapest even without subsidies, new installations will continue. U.S. demand for electricity is forecast to grow about 2% annually. This makes even the current Department of Energy enthusiastic about many components of the energy transition, including non-carbon energy sources, as reflected in last week’s DOE announcement of investments in small modular nuclear reactors.

Chart of Annual US Energy Consumption 1776-2023 (source: eia.gov)
Annual U.S. energy consumption for 1776-2023 (Source: eia.gov)

Consistent with these three points, the 2025 “All In” report by Founders Pledge concludes that investment priorities for the U.S. should be technological innovation, which the U.S. has done better than any other nation until being hamstrung by the current Trump assault on U.S. science infrastructure, and increasing grid capacity along with permitting reform to accelerate grid connections for new energy sources.

Cornell Atkinson will therefore continue to fund research-to-impact projects on solar, wind, and hydropower energy innovation and deployment, along with battery technology and grid management like those we have routinely co-created for several years with NGOs, corporations, and government agencies. For example, we are partnering with At-Sea Development to explore tidal energy, and with many other non-academic organizations on R&D for wave energy, hydrogen, nuclear energy, and storage.

Our collaboration with Clean Air Task Force (CATF) exemplifies the power of such alliances. We’re working together on critical initiatives that align with both current needs and future opportunities: analyzing policy mechanisms for carbon dioxide removal (CDR); and developing comprehensive grid models for New York State that can inform similar efforts nationwide. With CATF we are also building on Cornell’s investments in deep geothermal to explore transformative superhot rocks geothermal technology. By combining Cornell University‘s research expertise with CATF’s policy and technical knowledge, we’re creating the kind of powerful synergies needed to drive meaningful progress in clean energy deployment and climate action, both domestically and globally. One or more of these innovative approaches is likely to produce the next transformative jump in non-carbon energy production in the U.S.

On the Ithaca campus in the next year, we’ll deploy a new mobile backup battery, an anaerobic biodigester at one of the university’s dairies, and a mobile carbon capture experimental platform at the university’s high-efficiency natural gas-fired combined heat and power plant. These projects are the direct result of Cornell Atkinson’s collaboration with multiple Cornell colleges, and the university’s office of Facilities and Campus Services. Collectively these steps continue to decrease Cornell’s net GHG emissions – 36% lower in 2024 than a 2008 baseline– and leverage the campus as a living laboratory to accelerate R&D toward scaling solutions elsewhere.

At Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability we think globally and act locally, nationally, and globally.

Learn more about David M. Lodge

Sign up for our newsletter:

Subscribe